What Makes Cross-Cultural Collaboration Work?
Episode Overview
Hisham ElSaied joins this episode of the Vantage Influencers Podcast to unpack why so many well-meaning teams still talk past each other. He opens with a blunt observation: leaders routinely label quiet or non-confrontational colleagues as shy or lacking confidence, when what is actually happening is a cultural dimension called power distance, the comfort level someone has with speaking up in front of a manager or offering a differing view in a group setting. That single blind spot, he argues, quietly kills more ideas on global teams than any skills gap ever could.
He also walks through why identical behaviors carry opposite meanings depending on where you are, sustained eye contact can read as confidence in one setting and as disrespect in another, and why he now leads with what he calls the platinum rule: treat colleagues the way they want to be treated, not the way you would want to be treated yourself. Drawing on a cultural intelligence study that pitted homogeneous teams against diverse ones, he makes the case that diversity by itself does not produce better ideas, teams only out-innovate homogeneous ones once cultural intelligence is added to the mix. The conversation closes with practical advice on running inclusive virtual meetings, from anonymous surveys to pre-meeting one-on-ones, so quieter, indirect communicators are heard before decisions get locked in.
Episode Highlights
- Cultural blind spots often get mistaken for personality traits, quiet or non-confrontational colleagues may simply be navigating power distance, not lacking confidence.
- Eye contact carries different meanings across cultures, it can signal respect toward a senior colleague in one culture and read as disrespectful in another.
- The platinum rule outperforms the golden rule, treat colleagues the way they want to be treated, not the way you would want to be treated.
- Direct communicators want the message stated plainly, while indirect communicators expect tone, context, and setting to carry as much meaning as the words themselves.
- Trust is built differently across cultures, some teams trust credentials and track record, others trust relationships built outside the meeting agenda.
- Diversity alone does not boost creativity, a cultural intelligence study found diverse teams only outperformed homogeneous ones once cultural intelligence was added to the mix.
About the Guest
Hisham ElSaied, Regional HR Head - MENA, Helmerich & Payne
Hisham ElSaied is a seasoned HR leader with over 18 years of global experience building high-performing, diverse teams across three continents, including partnerships with Fortune 500 companies. He is certified in executive coaching, cultural intelligence, and MBTI personality assessments, and has delivered more than 200 hours of training and coaching to leaders and teams around the world, leading workshops and conferences across the United States, France, and the Middle East and North Africa with a focus on leadership development, team performance, and organizational culture transformation.
Connect with Hisham on LinkedIn
Host
Susmita Sarma, Vantage Influencers Podcast Host
What You Will Learn
- How power distance shapes whether someone speaks up in a meeting or stays quiet
- Why the platinum rule outperforms the golden rule on cross-cultural teams
- How to adapt your communication style for direct versus indirect communicators
- Why competency-based trust and relationship-based trust need different approaches
- How to run virtual meetings that are genuinely inclusive of quieter, indirect communicators
- Why diversity alone does not guarantee more creative outcomes
Key Topics & Timestamps
| Timestamp | Topic |
|---|---|
| 01:37 | Hisham's corporate background and how it shaped his focus on cross-cultural communication |
| 02:52 | A workplace cultural misunderstanding rooted in stereotyping and power distance |
| 05:04 | Adapting communication style for direct and indirect communicators |
| 08:52 | Running inclusive team meetings across power distance and time-culture differences |
| 12:45 | Separating personality traits from cultural norms |
| 15:10 | How a colleague's cultural background sparked an innovative solution |
| 16:36 | Final advice for HR professionals on building cross-cultural communication skills |
Full Transcript
Click to read the full episode transcript
Welcome to the Vantage HR Influencers Podcast. This podcast is sponsored by Vantage Circle, the simple and AI-powered rewards and recognition platform for employee engagement.
Cross-cultural communication in the workplace, where different perspectives and backgrounds come together to build a stronger and more innovative team. We all know that communication is the key to success, but when cultures collide, things can sometimes get lost in translation. So, how do we adapt our communication styles to bridge those gaps and make sure that everyone is on the same page?
In today's episode, we'll dive into some real stories of how cultural differences have shaped the way we work, the lessons we have learned from those awkward moments, and how embracing diversity can spark creativity and better problem solving in teams.
Susmita Sarma: Hi, everyone. Welcome to another exciting episode of the Vantage Influencers Podcast. I'm your host, Susmita, and today's guest is Hisham ElSaied, the Regional HR Head, MENA, at Helmerich & Payne, an award-winning HR leader, certified executive coach, speaker, and trainer, and of course, an expert in navigating cross-cultural dynamics in the workplace. So, let's begin. Welcome to the show, Sam. I'm thrilled to have you with us today.
Hisham ElSaied: Thank you, Susmita. It's my pleasure.
Susmita Sarma: Thank you for joining me. So, before we dive into our discussion, Sam, could you share a bit about your corporate journey, like what experiences led you to focus on cross-cultural communication in the workplace?
Hisham ElSaied: Sure. So, my name is Hisham ElSaied. I've been working in corporate for over 18 years across three continents, and I have worked with organizations from different cultural backgrounds, from Japanese, American, Canadian, French, and the Middle East. I also lived in more than four countries, and it gave me a fascination about cultural intelligence and cross-cultural communication. So, I studied at an academic level, and I got certified as a cultural intelligence facilitator and trainer from the center of cultural intelligence in the US. I'm currently based out of Dubai, heading the HR function for an American oil and gas company.
Susmita Sarma: Okay. That's a fascinating journey, Sam. It's clear that your experiences have shaped your understanding of the complexities involved in cross-cultural communication. So, as we explore the topic further, I would like to dive into some specific examples and insights that can help others navigate similar challenges. So, let's start with our first question. I'm really curious to hear about this, Sam. Is there a specific example of a cultural norm or practice that you initially misunderstood in a workplace setting? I'd love to know how that experience changed your perspective.
Hisham ElSaied: Well, absolutely. In general, we tend to stereotype and label people. So, if we find someone who is not interactive or not speaking much, we might label them as shy or introverted, or having social anxiety, or any of these labels that we love to put on people, without really understanding their cultural preferences.
And we often ignore one of the most important cultural dimensions, which is power distance. In some cultures, it is unacceptable to speak in the presence of your manager, to provide a different point of view, or to oppose them. In other cultures, conflict is seen as unhealthy and should be avoided, so people will not be in conflict with each other in public, and that's simply their cultural preference. It has nothing to do with them being shy.
Most of the leadership theories in books and podcasts are based on the US market, but we have to remember that more than 75% of the world's population do not share the same cultural dimensions and cultural values. That's why a different view is needed, more culturally intelligent leadership theories are required.
Another example of a cultural norm that can be misunderstood is eye contact. It's always encouraged to maintain eye contact while speaking, but that's not a universal trait. In some cultures, maintaining eye contact with the opposite gender is not accepted, and is sometimes considered disrespectful. In other cultures, maintaining eye contact with more senior people in the organization is a sign of respect. So, before jumping into conclusions and stereotyping or labeling people, we have to increase our cultural knowledge and understand the cultural preferences of different groups.
Susmita Sarma: And this really highlights the importance of being open to learning from these differences, right? So, building on that, have you ever had to change your communication style to foster effective collaboration? I'd love to know how you navigated those adaptations, and what specific strategies or approaches worked for you when working with a colleague from a different cultural background.
Hisham ElSaied: Yeah, absolutely. As you're saying, there's no one-size-fits-all, that's for sure. We've always been taught the golden rule, that you treat people the way you want to be treated. But I'd like to replace this golden rule with a platinum rule, which is to treat people the way they want to be treated. You won't know the way they want to be treated unless you enhance your cultural intelligence and better understand different cultural values and behaviors.
Two cultural behaviors heavily impact communication here. We already talked about power distance, so I won't repeat it. But the other one is direct and indirect communication, so flexing your style depending on your audience is really important. In a direct communication culture, the message is the words themselves, the words that are being said. In an indirect communication culture, also referred to as a high-context culture, the message is not only the words, it's also about how, where, and when it's said. Context plays a big role, the body language, the tone of voice, the setting where the conversation is held, whether it was an informal chat over coffee or a formal meeting.
So it's important to keep this in mind when dealing with different people. With direct communicators, my advice is to be precise, be direct, don't spend a lot of time on introductions or setting a lot of context, it doesn't matter to them, they need to hear the message as it is. With people from an indirect communication culture, it's not only the message, so listen carefully, allow them time to reflect and think, and get their input by asking indirect, open-ended questions, because the whole message is not only the words, it's also how they are being said.
Another cultural dimension that plays a role in communication is trust building. In some cultures, trust is built based on competency, it's called competency-based trust, you trust someone's credentials, their previous experience, their degrees, their certificates. In other cultures, trust is built based on relationships, people trust based on personal knowledge of a person, word of mouth, not only competencies or degrees.
So, going back to your question on flexing style, when you deal with people from a relationship-based trust culture, it's very important to spend time getting to know them on a deeper level, beyond their job titles and responsibilities. That helps any leader build trust with team members from those cultures. This was personally important for me, because I originally came from a competency-based trust background, so I would go straight into the meeting agenda and notes without getting to know people. I discovered through my journey that it doesn't work with everyone. Some people won't trust you unless they know you, unless you spend time together and talk about non-business things to build the relationship before jumping into the to-do list or the projects that need to be finished.
Susmita Sarma: All your examples highlight how being respectful, flexible, and empathetic can enhance collaboration in a team, and it can definitely inspire others to be more mindful in their communication. But Sam, if we talk about handling team meetings, working with diverse cultural backgrounds can bring its own set of challenges. So how do you stay committed to inclusivity and set a positive tone for team dynamics?
Hisham ElSaied: Absolutely. It's very important, especially now in this age where most team meetings are happening via Teams or Zoom, remotely, not in person. That adds another layer of complexity to making sure your meetings are inclusive.
When we look at facilitating team meetings, we have to pay attention to two more cultural dimensions. One is direct and indirect communication. When we ask indirect communicators, especially in virtual settings, to give feedback, we have to give them multiple ways to speak up, not necessarily by putting them on the spot in front of everyone and asking them to share their opinion live in the meeting, because they might not be comfortable doing that, especially if they come from a high power distance and indirect communication background. So what we can do is have one-on-one conversations, or use anonymous surveys where they don't have to reveal their identity. These strategies help indirect communicators feel heard. You can also do quick one-on-ones before the meeting and ask for their views, so they don't have to speak in front of everyone and feel put on the spot. And when we do talk to them, we have to recap the points discussed and agree on action plans and deadlines, because indirect communicators are always thinking about context, not just the message, so make sure nothing is left to interpretation or left vague.
The other dimension in facilitating team meetings, a funny one, is the relationship with time, because there are two types of cultures here as well. The first is what we call monochronic, or clock, linear culture, people from these cultures tend to deal with one task at a time, in sequence, and respect the clock, the hour, and the minute. The other is what we call polychronic, or event, culture, people from these cultures tend to multitask and juggle many things at the same time, and have a more flexible relationship with time.
In monochronic cultures, we talk about work-life balance, a term that comes from the Western world. In other parts of the world, you will see more of a work-life blend rather than work-life balance, so you will find people attending virtual meetings with their kids around, or something happening in the background at home. They don't split work and life the same way. When we run or facilitate a meeting virtually, we have to keep in mind that people's relationship with time is not the same.
So when dealing with polychronic people, we have to make sure deadlines are communicated clearly and reminded, and another tip is to build in some buffer time beyond the deadline, because they will most likely ask for an extension. Their relationship with time is flexible, and we're not saying that's good or bad, it's just a different culture, and that's the importance of cultural intelligence, flexing to it, and understanding that it's not a sign of disrespect or a lack of commitment. It's just that the relationship with time is different according to culture, and that's important to keep in mind.
Susmita Sarma: So much to learn from you, Sam. Because of time constraints, we've kept it to just a few questions, so let's move on to the next one. As we explore these dynamics further, I know it can be tricky to navigate the line between cultural norms and individual personality traits. So I'm really interested in your take on this, how do you figure out the difference when working with colleagues?
Hisham ElSaied: This is a very good question, Susmita, because the two usually overlap. Generally speaking, personality is individual, and it's both inherited and learned over time. I don't want to add more complexity to your question, but I want to add a third layer, which is human nature. Human nature is the base of the pyramid, it's based on evolution and shared across all of humanity, the need for shelter, food, safety, and a sense of belonging, anything you find at the base of Maslow's hierarchy of needs. Then comes personality, the second layer, which is a mix of what's inherited and what's gained through life, some personality traits come from your DNA, and others are shaped by your environment, your family, and the way you were raised.
When it comes to culture, culture is not inherited, we're not born with cultural norms, we're just born with human nature and some personality traits. Cultural norms are 100% learned, gained from our societies over our lifetime. So to help differentiate, culture in general is not individual, any cultural study that's happened across history looks at groups and societies, not individuals. Personality traits are very individual, a mix of what's inherited and what's learned by the person themselves. Culture belongs more to groups than to an individual. I hope this helps differentiate between what's personal to one person and what's more of a societal or cultural norm.
Susmita Sarma: That truly emphasizes the value of communication and personal connection in understanding our colleagues better. Your insights are incredibly helpful, Sam, and there's so much to learn about individual personality traits too. I recently had a fascinating conversation with Dr. Muhammad Hassan, who shared insights on the MBTI framework, so if our listeners are curious about that topic, I highly recommend checking out that episode, you're going to love it, and I'll make sure to include the link in the show notes. So, was there a moment, Sam, when a team member's cultural background inspired an innovative solution that you wouldn't have thought of otherwise? Can you highlight how unique contributions from different cultural perspectives can enhance teamwork or a project?
Hisham ElSaied: Absolutely. Let me start with an interesting study conducted by a center for cultural intelligence. It aimed to measure the number of creative solutions based on the diversity of a team, so they divided people into two groups, one homogeneous and one diversified. Surprisingly, the homogeneous group produced slightly more creative solutions at first, but that was because the diversified group had low cultural intelligence. When they repeated the experiment with a diversified group that had high cultural intelligence, the number of innovative solutions coming from that group doubled.
So, in summary, diversity without cultural intelligence won't have a positive impact on creativity. Cultural intelligence is the key, because with it, people work better as a team, they're more considerate of their differences, they understand each other's cultural values, and they communicate better and more efficiently. When you're culturally intelligent, you're able to help a team reach more innovative solutions. Diversity by itself is not the solution, cultural intelligence is really the key.
Susmita Sarma: That's an inspiring example, Hisham. As we wrap up, what final piece of advice would you offer to our HR audience looking to enhance cross-cultural communication in the workplace?
Hisham ElSaied: Well, cultural intelligence is usually overlooked, and the impact of cultural differences is somehow underestimated in the workplace. So my first and foremost advice would be to build your cultural intelligence capability, by reading books, listening to podcasts, even taking formal training. We're not asking anyone to change their culture, because culture is the lens through which they see the world. Learning more about cultural intelligence will even help people understand themselves better, they'll know how their culture shapes their behavior.
Going back to personality traits, culture is only one aspect of personality. Culture, personality traits, and the surrounding environment together shape human behavior. Look at cultural intelligence, look at your own culture, try to understand different personality types without ignoring the role the surrounding environment plays. If you understand these three pillars together, you'll understand human behavior.
Susmita Sarma: That's brilliant. Thank you so much, Hisham, for sharing your invaluable insights with us today. It's been a pleasure having you on the show.
Hisham ElSaied: Thank you, Susmita. It was my pleasure. Thank you so much.
Susmita Sarma: That conversation really highlighted how essential it is to blend empathy and adaptability in today's multicultural work environments. It's fascinating to hear the creative ways you can tackle challenges and build an inclusive culture. We're sure our listeners will walk away with fresh perspectives and actionable insights to apply in their own workplaces.
Thanks for listening to the Vantage HR Influencers Podcast. Please subscribe to the Vantage HR Influencers Podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and our YouTube channel for new episodes.
FAQ
What is the "platinum rule" in cross-cultural communication?
The platinum rule means treating colleagues the way they want to be treated, not the way you would want to be treated yourself. It requires building enough cultural intelligence to understand what different colleagues actually need, whether that is directness, context, or time to reflect before responding.
Why does eye contact mean different things in different cultures?
Eye contact is not a universal signal of confidence or honesty. In some cultures, maintaining eye contact with someone senior or with the opposite gender is seen as disrespectful, while in others it signals respect toward authority. Reading it the wrong way can lead to unfair judgments about a colleague's confidence or trustworthiness.
Does a culturally diverse team automatically produce better ideas?
No. A cultural intelligence study found that diverse teams did not outperform homogeneous teams until cultural intelligence was added to the mix. Diversity creates the raw material for better ideas, but cultural intelligence is what turns that diversity into stronger collaboration and creativity.
How can HR leaders make virtual meetings more inclusive for indirect communicators?
Give indirect communicators multiple ways to contribute instead of only asking them to speak up live in a group setting. One-on-one check-ins before the meeting and anonymous surveys let people share honest input without the discomfort of being put on the spot, especially for those from high power distance or indirect communication backgrounds.